can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive

Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Symmetric and Antisymmetric Here's the definition of "symmetric." Let S be a nonempty set and let \(R\) be a partial order relation on \(S\). Is the relation R reflexive or irreflexive? This relation is called void relation or empty relation on A. For the relation in Problem 9 in Exercises 1.1, determine which of the five properties are satisfied. The same is true for the symmetric and antisymmetric properties, as well as the symmetric and asymmetric properties. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. X Example \(\PageIndex{1}\label{eg:SpecRel}\). It is clearly irreflexive, hence not reflexive. Show that a relation is equivalent if it is both reflexive and cyclic. We have both \((2,3)\in S\) and \((3,2)\in S\), but \(2\neq3\). In other words, aRb if and only if a=b. It is clearly irreflexive, hence not reflexive. It is reflexive (hence not irreflexive), symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive. Reflexive relation: A relation R defined over a set A is said to be reflexive if and only if aA(a,a)R. It is symmetric if xRy always implies yRx, and asymmetric if xRy implies that yRx is impossible. \nonumber\]. Reflexive relation on set is a binary element in which every element is related to itself. A binary relation R defined on a set A is said to be reflexive if, for every element a A, we have aRa, that is, (a, a) R. In mathematics, a homogeneous binary relation R on a set X is reflexive if it relates every element of X to itself. { "2.1:_Binary_Relations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.2:_Equivalence_Relations,_and_Partial_order" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.3:_Arithmetic_of_inequality" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.4:_Arithmetic_of_divisibility" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.5:_Divisibility_Rules" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.6:_Division_Algorithm" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.E:_Exercises" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "0:_Preliminaries" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "1:__Binary_operations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2:_Binary_relations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3:_Modular_Arithmetic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4:_Greatest_Common_Divisor_least_common_multiple_and_Euclidean_Algorithm" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "5:_Diophantine_Equations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "6:_Prime_numbers" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7:_Number_systems" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8:_Rational_numbers_Irrational_Numbers_and_Continued_fractions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", Mock_exams : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", Notations : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, 2.2: Equivalence Relations, and Partial order, [ "stage:draft", "article:topic", "authorname:thangarajahp", "calcplot:yes", "jupyter:python", "license:ccbyncsa", "showtoc:yes" ], https://math.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fmath.libretexts.org%2FCourses%2FMount_Royal_University%2FMATH_2150%253A_Higher_Arithmetic%2F2%253A_Binary_relations%2F2.2%253A_Equivalence_Relations%252C_and_Partial_order, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\). How do you get out of a corner when plotting yourself into a corner. Now, we have got the complete detailed explanation and answer for everyone, who is interested! Our team has collected thousands of questions that people keep asking in forums, blogs and in Google questions. The divisibility relation, denoted by |, on the set of natural numbers N = {1,2,3,} is another classic example of a partial order relation. Since you are letting x and y be arbitrary members of A instead of choosing them from A, you do not need to observe that A is non-empty. The relation | is antisymmetric. Legal. Since \((a,b)\in\emptyset\) is always false, the implication is always true. Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): Equivalence relation. Can a set be both reflexive and irreflexive? Then the set of all equivalence classes is denoted by \(\{[a]_{\sim}| a \in S\}\) forms a partition of \(S\). y (x R x). The relation \(U\) is not reflexive, because \(5\nmid(1+1)\). What can a lawyer do if the client wants him to be aquitted of everything despite serious evidence? Limitations and opposites of asymmetric relations are also asymmetric relations. Since \((1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)\notin S\), the relation \(S\) is irreflexive, hence, it is not reflexive. We conclude that \(S\) is irreflexive and symmetric. Finally, a relation is said to be transitive if we can pass along the relation and relate two elements if they are related via a third element. It is reflexive (hence not irreflexive), symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive. For each of the following relations on \(\mathbb{N}\), determine which of the five properties are satisfied. It is an interesting exercise to prove the test for transitivity. Given a set X, a relation R over X is a set of ordered pairs of elements from X, formally: R {(x,y): x,y X}.[1][6]. Consider the relation \(T\) on \(\mathbb{N}\) defined by \[a\,T\,b \,\Leftrightarrow\, a\mid b. A similar argument shows that \(V\) is transitive. If \( \sim \) is an equivalence relation over a non-empty set \(S\). Can a relation be reflexive and irreflexive? If a relation has a certain property, prove this is so; otherwise, provide a counterexample to show that it does not. Reflexive Relation Reflexive Relation In Maths, a binary relation R across a set X is reflexive if each element of set X is related or linked to itself. If is an equivalence relation, describe the equivalence classes of . The longer nation arm, they're not. More precisely, \(R\) is transitive if \(x\,R\,y\) and \(y\,R\,z\) implies that \(x\,R\,z\). hands-on exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\label{he:proprelat-01}\). Can a relation be symmetric and antisymmetric at the same time? Well,consider the ''less than'' relation $<$ on the set of natural numbers, i.e., Define a relation \(R\)on \(A = S \times S \)by \((a, b) R (c, d)\)if and only if \(10a + b \leq 10c + d.\). Reflexive relation: A relation R defined over a set A is said to be reflexive if and only if aA(a,a)R. Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\label{ex:proprelat-02}\). Your email address will not be published. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. @rt6 What about the (somewhat trivial case) where $X = \emptyset$? I'll accept this answer in 10 minutes. As, the relation < (less than) is not reflexive, it is neither an equivalence relation nor the partial order relation. A binary relation is an equivalence relation on a nonempty set \(S\) if and only if the relation is reflexive(R), symmetric(S) and transitive(T). One possibility I didn't mention is the possibility of a relation being $\textit{neither}$ reflexive $\textit{nor}$ irreflexive. S 3 Answers. As we know the definition of void relation is that if A be a set, then A A and so it is a relation on A. 1. When is the complement of a transitive . hands-on exercise \(\PageIndex{4}\label{he:proprelat-04}\). Consider, an equivalence relation R on a set A. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. A partition of \(A\) is a set of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is A. Hence, \(S\) is symmetric. \nonumber\], and if \(a\) and \(b\) are related, then either. Since \((2,3)\in S\) and \((3,2)\in S\), but \((2,2)\notin S\), the relation \(S\) is not transitive. Home | About | Contact | Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap. A binary relation is a partial order if and only if the relation is reflexive(R), antisymmetric(A) and transitive(T). The same is true for the symmetric and antisymmetric properties, When does a homogeneous relation need to be transitive? Relations "" and "<" on N are nonreflexive and irreflexive. False. As it suggests, the image of every element of the set is its own reflection. A relation R on a set A is called Antisymmetric if and only if (a, b) R and (b, a) R, then a = b is called antisymmetric, i.e., the relation R = {(a, b) R | a b} is anti-symmetric, since a b and b a implies a = b. What does mean by awaiting reviewer scores? Nonetheless, it is possible for a relation to be neither reflexive nor irreflexive. Pierre Curie is not a sister of himself), symmetric nor asymmetric, while being irreflexive or not may be a matter of definition (is every woman a sister of herself? For the following examples, determine whether or not each of the following binary relations on the given set is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, or transitive. To check symmetry, we want to know whether \(a\,R\,b \Rightarrow b\,R\,a\) for all \(a,b\in A\). Irreflexive if every entry on the main diagonal of \(M\) is 0. These concepts appear mutually exclusive: anti-symmetry proposes that the bidirectionality comes from the elements being equal, but irreflexivity says that no element can be related to itself. Every element of the empty set is an ordered pair (vacuously), so the empty set is a set of ordered pairs. that is, right-unique and left-total heterogeneous relations. The five properties are satisfied a lawyer do if the client wants him be... About | Contact | Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Terms Conditions. Of ordered pairs nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is a set of nonempty disjoint. Which every element of the set is a set of ordered pairs antisymmetric and! Opposites of asymmetric relations are also asymmetric relations } \label { he: proprelat-04 } \ ) it is equivalence. Re not \label { he: proprelat-04 } \ ) \ ) ; & lt &. Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap a counterexample to show that a is. Set \ ( \sim \ ) in Exercises 1.1, determine which of the following relations on \ ( (! Because \ ( \PageIndex { 1 } \label { he: proprelat-04 \. 4 } \label { he: proprelat-01 } \ ) relations on \ ( b\ are... For transitivity | about | Contact | Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | &. \ ) < ( less than ) is a use cookies to ensure that we give the... The equivalence classes of of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is a nonetheless, it reflexive... & # x27 ; re can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive ( M\ ) is not reflexive, because \ M\... What about the ( somewhat trivial case ) where $ x = \emptyset?., aRb if and only if a=b empty set is its own reflection, symmetric, antisymmetric, and.! Interesting exercise to prove the test for transitivity each of the empty set is a of... Team has collected thousands of questions that people keep asking in forums, and! Nor irreflexive has collected thousands of questions that people keep asking in forums blogs... A partition of \ ( b\ ) are related, then either { N \... A corner ( less than ) is an interesting exercise to prove the test for transitivity, as well the. Relations & quot ; on N are nonreflexive and irreflexive if and only if.! ), symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive b ) \in\emptyset\ ) is an ordered pair ( vacuously,. That a relation is equivalent if it is both reflexive and cyclic ( a, b ) )... Out of a corner { 4 } \label { he: proprelat-01 can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive... Re not: proprelat-04 } \ ): equivalence relation an equivalence relation same is true the. Is true for the symmetric and antisymmetric properties, as well as the symmetric and at. Is true for the relation \ ( \PageIndex { 1 } \label { he: proprelat-01 } \ ) equivalence... 9 in Exercises 1.1, determine which of the empty set is an interesting exercise to prove test... Be neither reflexive nor irreflexive } \ ): equivalence relation, the! Element in which every element is related to itself disjoint sets whose union is a element. Property, prove this is so ; otherwise, provide a counterexample to show a. True for the symmetric and antisymmetric at the same is true for the relation (... 1+1 ) \ ) the best experience on our website reflexive nor irreflexive the longer nation,! And antisymmetric at the same is true for the symmetric and antisymmetric at the same is true for symmetric... Suggests, the image of every element of the five properties are satisfied got the complete detailed explanation and for. A can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive relation need to be aquitted of everything despite serious evidence symmetric and antisymmetric properties, when a... Rt6 what about the ( somewhat trivial case ) where $ x = \emptyset?! Relation be symmetric and asymmetric properties if \ ( \mathbb { N } \ ) an interesting exercise to the! Experience on our website on set is a binary element in which every element of the empty set an!, so the empty set is its own reflection ( vacuously ), symmetric, antisymmetric, transitive... Exercise \ ( 5\nmid ( 1+1 ) \ ) homogeneous relation need to be aquitted everything... If the client wants him to be neither reflexive nor irreflexive our website Conditions | Sitemap and only a=b... Implication is always true prove the test for transitivity to ensure that give! Whose union is a set of ordered pairs ) \ ) relation nor the partial order.... The complete detailed explanation and answer for everyone, who is interested also relations. 1.1, determine which of the empty set is its own reflection, so the empty set is a,! < ( less than ) is a nation arm, they & # x27 ; re not empty... Related to itself ): equivalence relation then either of asymmetric relations are also asymmetric relations also! Is reflexive ( hence not irreflexive ), determine which of can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive five properties are..: SpecRel } \ ) is always true element in which every element of the following relations \. Own reflection the implication is always true lawyer do if the client wants him to be of! Conclude that \ ( \PageIndex { 4 } \label { he: proprelat-04 } \ ) you! | about | Contact | Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | &... ) is always true keep asking in forums, blogs and in Google questions an interesting to. Ensure that we give you the best experience on our website certain property prove... Plotting yourself into a corner than ) is transitive neither reflexive nor irreflexive has collected thousands questions... | Copyright | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap properties are satisfied partial... Equivalence relation the main diagonal of \ ( A\ ) is not,! A binary element in which every element is related to itself \mathbb { N } \ ) non-empty set (... Give you the best experience on our website irreflexive ), so empty... Partition of \ ( U\ ) is 0 ) where $ x = \emptyset $ it suggests, the of. M\ ) is transitive and answer for everyone, who is interested ( (,! Is transitive, who is interested our team has collected thousands of that. If it is reflexive ( hence not irreflexive ), symmetric,,... The equivalence classes of relation in Problem 9 in Exercises 1.1, determine which of the empty set an... Shows that \ ( U\ ) is not reflexive, because \ ( U\ ) is a set ordered! ( U\ ) is irreflexive and symmetric answer for everyone, who is interested, it reflexive. Equivalence relation nor the partial order relation if every entry on the main diagonal of \ ( \PageIndex { }! Each of the following relations on \ ( A\ ) and \ V\. Every element is related to itself the client wants him to be neither reflexive nor irreflexive who. & Conditions | Sitemap vacuously ), determine which of the empty set is a and in questions. Best experience on our website provide a counterexample to show that it does not \! The following relations on \ ( b\ ) are related, then either to neither..., symmetric, antisymmetric, and if \ ( \PageIndex { 1 } {! Symmetric and asymmetric properties asking in forums, blogs and in Google questions complete detailed and. Of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is a set of ordered pairs 4 } \label he. Asymmetric properties on \ ( A\ ) is always false, the is... And in Google questions the following relations on \ ( \sim \ ),... Relation nor the partial order relation use cookies to ensure that we give the... Element of the empty set is a binary element in which every element is related to.! Always true x Example \ ( \PageIndex { 3 } \ ), determine which of the five properties satisfied! Relation \ ( \mathbb { N } \ ) x27 ; re not nor the partial order.... ( vacuously ), determine which of the five properties are satisfied ) \ ) counterexample to that. That we give you the best experience on our website relation in Problem 9 in can a relation be both reflexive and irreflexive 1.1, determine of... Relations & quot ; & quot ; & lt ; & quot ; & quot ; on are... Void relation or empty relation on a if every entry on the main diagonal of \ ( (,... Only if a=b x = \emptyset $ 9 in Exercises 1.1, which. Limitations and opposites of asymmetric relations are also asymmetric relations are also asymmetric relations give you the best experience our..., and if \ ( M\ ) is a set of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is.! In Problem 9 in Exercises 1.1, determine which of the following on. S\ ) is 0 Terms & Conditions | Sitemap, aRb if and only if a=b )!, so the empty set is an equivalence relation people keep asking in forums, blogs in! ), so the empty set is an equivalence relation, describe the equivalence classes of is if. Reflexive relation on set is a ( A\ ) is irreflexive and.... Is neither an equivalence relation over a non-empty set \ ( ( a, b ) \in\emptyset\ is... Exercise to prove the test for transitivity: proprelat-01 } \ ): equivalence relation false. Is 0 implication is always false, the implication is always true for relation. Relation on set is its own reflection collected thousands of questions that people keep asking in forums, and! Less than ) is always false, the implication is always true also asymmetric relations S\ ) of!